The Magic Chef MCR170 ranks first for its especially usable storage and strong compact-space performance. The Danby is a close alternative when a two-door design and larger capacity matter most.
01
MC
Magic Chef
Magic Chef MCR170
The Magic Chef MCR170 leads with smart storage design, strong cooling results, and excellent practicality for compact spaces.
Wirecutter tested more than a dozen mini fridges and highlighted the MCR170 for smartly designed storage and usability.
Three independent write-ins unlock an honorable mention. The 10 strongest active mentions are shown; inactive mentions archive after 12 months. At 25 recent votes, a contender is scored for possible automatic Top 5 promotion.
No honorable mentions yet. Community suggestions appear below while they gather support.
Commercial-link disclosure: Some shopping, booking, and job-search links are affiliate links. We may earn commissions from qualifying purchases, bookings, or signups through those links, at no added cost to you. Other links are ordinary, non-affiliate links. Affiliate commissions do not determine research scores or community votes. Read our disclosures.
THE SCORING
HOW ALL FIVE SCORED
The five criteria create the AI baseline. The community adjustment is then added or subtracted to produce the current published score.
Keep the criteria fixedSwipe to compare all five →
Criterion
#1Magic Chef MCR170
#2Danby 3.1 cu. ft. 2-Door Compact Fridge
#3Galanz Retro Compact Mini Refrigerator
#4Frigidaire EFR840
#5Whynter BR-1211DS
88
88
84
85
82
94
86
84
86
80
90
89
82
76
85
86
87
82
84
78
84
84
91
86
84
AI baseline scoreWeighted criteria result
88.6
87.0
84.3
83.3
81.7
Community adjustmentVote-share influence
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Current published scoreBaseline + community
89
87
84
83
82
#1
Magic Chef MCR170
89/100
AI baseline88.6
Community0.0
Published89
#2
Danby 3.1 cu. ft. 2-Door Compact Fridge
87/100
AI baseline87.0
Community0.0
Published87
#3
Galanz Retro Compact Mini Refrigerator
84/100
AI baseline84.3
Community0.0
Published84
#4
Frigidaire EFR840
83/100
AI baseline83.3
Community0.0
Published83
#5
Whynter BR-1211DS
82/100
AI baseline81.7
Community0.0
Published82
Cooling performance · 25%How effectively the fridge keeps refrigerated and frozen items at appropriate temperatures, based on supplied testing evidence.
THE SCORING
HOW ALL FIVE SCORED
The five criteria create the AI baseline. The community adjustment is then added or subtracted to produce the current published score.
Keep the criteria fixedSwipe to compare all five →
Criterion
#1Magic Chef MCR170
#2Danby 3.1 cu. ft. 2-Door Compact Fridge
#3Galanz Retro Compact Mini Refrigerator
#4Frigidaire EFR840
#5Whynter BR-1211DS
88
88
84
85
82
94
86
84
86
80
90
89
82
76
85
86
87
82
84
78
84
84
91
86
84
AI baseline scoreWeighted criteria result
88.6
87.0
84.3
83.3
81.7
Community adjustmentVote-share influence
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Current published scoreBaseline + community
89
87
84
83
82
#1
Magic Chef MCR170
89/100
AI baseline88.6
Community0.0
Published89
#2
Danby 3.1 cu. ft. 2-Door Compact Fridge
87/100
AI baseline87.0
Community0.0
Published87
#3
Galanz Retro Compact Mini Refrigerator
84/100
AI baseline84.3
Community0.0
Published84
#4
Frigidaire EFR840
83/100
AI baseline83.3
Community0.0
Published83
#5
Whynter BR-1211DS
82/100
AI baseline81.7
Community0.0
Published82
Cooling performance · 25%How effectively the fridge keeps refrigerated and frozen items at appropriate temperatures, based on supplied testing evidence.
HEAD TO HEAD
COMPARE TWO CONTENDERS
Choose any two contenders. We’ll line up what matters.
CONTENDER
MC
Magic Chef
Magic Chef MCR170
89
D
Danby
Danby 3.1 cu. ft. 2-Door Compact Fridge
87
Form factor
Compact cube refrigerator
Could not independently verify
Freezer
Freezer compartment tested for frozen food
Could not independently verify
Capacity
Could not independently verify
3.1 cu. ft.
MC
Magic Chef
Magic Chef MCR170
89/100D
Danby
Danby 3.1 cu. ft. 2-Door Compact Fridge
87/100
Form factor
Compact cube refrigerator
Could not independently verify
Freezer
Freezer compartment tested for frozen food
Could not independently verify
Capacity
Could not independently verify
3.1 cu. ft.
WHY THIS ORDER?
THE RECEIPTS, NOT THE MYSTERY.
Scored against cooling performance, storage usability, compact-space practicality, value, and features using the supplied testing and editorial evidence.