Aroldis Chapman ranks first among these MLB relief pitchers, and Mason Miller ranks second. All five contenders were evaluated on the same published criteria, and their weighted scores determine the order from highest to lowest.
Best current overall case
Aroldis Chapman represents Boston Red Sox in this mlb relief pitchers comparison. It is the strongest all-around choice in this group, with its clearest strengths in peak and impact. The peak assessment focuses on best-season or current high-end performance for the topic. Consistency is the main point to compare with the nearby contenders before choosing it.Closest current challenger
Mason Miller represents San Diego Padres in this mlb relief pitchers comparison. It is the closest alternative to the top choice, with its clearest strengths in peak and impact. The peak assessment focuses on best-season or current high-end performance for the topic. Complete game is the main point to compare with the nearby contenders before choosing it.Strong current top-three case
Edwin Diaz represents Los Angeles Dodgers in this mlb relief pitchers comparison. It offers a balanced middle-ground choice, with its clearest strengths in consistency and impact. The consistency assessment focuses on ability to sustain value across games and seasons. Big moments is the main point to compare with the nearby contenders before choosing it.Current top-five specialist
Cade Smith represents Cleveland Guardians in this mlb relief pitchers comparison. It is a more specialized alternative, with its clearest strengths in big moments and impact. The big moments assessment focuses on performance under the highest-leverage conditions. Consistency is the main point to compare with the nearby contenders before choosing it.Current top-five contender
Andres Munoz represents Seattle Mariners in this mlb relief pitchers comparison. It is the most situational option in this top five, with its clearest strengths in peak and consistency. The peak assessment focuses on best-season or current high-end performance for the topic.Three independent write-ins unlock an honorable mention. The 10 strongest active mentions are shown; inactive mentions archive after 12 months. At 25 monthly votes, a contender enters a scoring review for possible top-five promotion.
No honorable mentions yet. Repeated write-ins merge automatically.
Commercial-link disclosure: Some shopping and booking links may become affiliate links when a partner relationship is active. SummaRank may then earn a commission from qualifying purchases or bookings, at no added cost to you. Commercial availability never affects scores or rank order.
The five criteria create the AI baseline. The community adjustment is then added or subtracted to produce the current published score.
| Criterion | #1Aroldis Chapman | #2Mason Miller | #3Edwin Diaz | #4Cade Smith | #5Andres Munoz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95 | 97 | 90 | 86 | 89 | |
| 92 | 89 | 93 | 83 | 87 | |
| 95 | 91 | 91 | 91 | 84 | |
| 94 | 89 | 88 | 91 | 84 | |
| 93 | 90 | 88 | 92 | 84 | |
| AI baseline scoreWeighted criteria result | 94.0 | 92.0 | 90.2 | 88.0 | 86.1 |
| Community adjustmentVote-share influence | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Current published scoreBaseline + community | 94 | 92 | 90 | 88 | 86 |
Select any two contenders above.
We’ll line up what matters.
Boston Red Sox
San Diego Padres
#1 · Highest weighted score
#2 · Second-highest weighted score
Peak
Peak
Impact
Impact
Consistency
Complete game
SummaRank compared official statistics, advanced performance measures, era or park context, availability, and high-leverage impact, using current material from Major League Baseball, FanGraphs and the linked official or research references. Each contender was scored independently on the same five-part scorecard: Peak 30%, Consistency 20%, Impact 20%, Complete game 15%, Big moments 15%. The weighted total determines the published order from highest to lowest; criterion strengths are not assigned by rank position, and verified community voting can make a limited, visible adjustment.
The five criteria create the AI baseline. The community adjustment is then added or subtracted to produce the current published score.
| Criterion | #1Aroldis Chapman | #2Mason Miller | #3Edwin Diaz | #4Cade Smith | #5Andres Munoz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 95 | 97 | 90 | 86 | 89 | |
| 92 | 89 | 93 | 83 | 87 | |
| 95 | 91 | 91 | 91 | 84 | |
| 94 | 89 | 88 | 91 | 84 | |
| 93 | 90 | 88 | 92 | 84 | |
| AI baseline scoreWeighted criteria result | 94.0 | 92.0 | 90.2 | 88.0 | 86.1 |
| Community adjustmentVote-share influence | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Current published scoreBaseline + community | 94 | 92 | 90 | 88 | 86 |