Kimi K3 leads the current open-weight field for broad capability and agentic work, while GLM-5.3 and DeepSeek V4 offer strong alternatives with different licensing and deployment trade-offs.
IMPORTANT CONTEXTModel quality, licenses, hardware needs, and benchmark results change quickly; verify the current model card and license before deployment.
01
MA
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Kimi K3 is the strongest all-around pick for frontier capability, long-context work, multimodal input, and agentic coding.
Multiple supplied comparisons identify Kimi K3 as an overall or benchmark leader, with 2.8T total parameters, 104B active, multimodal input, and a 1M-token context.
GLM-5.3 is a high-capability long-context choice with a permissive-style MIT predecessor and a newer bespoke license requiring careful review.
Supplied sources repeatedly place the GLM family among the open-weight leaders; GLM-5.3 is reported at 743B total parameters, with a 1M-token context for the family and strong reasoning results.
Three independent write-ins unlock an honorable mention. The 10 strongest active mentions are shown; inactive mentions archive after 12 months. At 25 recent votes, a contender is scored for possible automatic Top 5 promotion.
No honorable mentions yet. Community suggestions appear below while they gather support.
THE SCORING
HOW ALL FIVE SCORED
The five criteria create the AI baseline. The community adjustment is then added or subtracted to produce the current published score.
Keep the criteria fixedSwipe to compare all five →
Criterion
#1Kimi K3
#2GLM-5.3
#3DeepSeek V4 Pro
#4Qwen3.6
#5Mistral Small 4
95
94
94
88
84
94
93
92
86
86
95
95
95
88
82
96
84
78
86
91
84
89
94
94
93
AI baseline scoreWeighted criteria result
93.3
91.8
91.4
88.2
86.4
Community adjustmentVote-share influence
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Current published scoreBaseline + community
93
92
91
88
86
#1
Kimi K3
93/100
AI baseline93.3
Community0.0
Published93
#2
GLM-5.3
92/100
AI baseline91.8
Community0.0
Published92
#3
DeepSeek V4 Pro
91/100
AI baseline91.4
Community0.0
Published91
#4
Qwen3.6
88/100
AI baseline88.2
Community0.0
Published88
#5
Mistral Small 4
86/100
AI baseline86.4
Community0.0
Published86
Capability · 30%Reported performance across general, reasoning, coding, and agent-oriented evaluations.
THE SCORING
HOW ALL FIVE SCORED
The five criteria create the AI baseline. The community adjustment is then added or subtracted to produce the current published score.
Keep the criteria fixedSwipe to compare all five →
Criterion
#1Kimi K3
#2GLM-5.3
#3DeepSeek V4 Pro
#4Qwen3.6
#5Mistral Small 4
95
94
94
88
84
94
93
92
86
86
95
95
95
88
82
96
84
78
86
91
84
89
94
94
93
AI baseline scoreWeighted criteria result
93.3
91.8
91.4
88.2
86.4
Community adjustmentVote-share influence
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Current published scoreBaseline + community
93
92
91
88
86
#1
Kimi K3
93/100
AI baseline93.3
Community0.0
Published93
#2
GLM-5.3
92/100
AI baseline91.8
Community0.0
Published92
#3
DeepSeek V4 Pro
91/100
AI baseline91.4
Community0.0
Published91
#4
Qwen3.6
88/100
AI baseline88.2
Community0.0
Published88
#5
Mistral Small 4
86/100
AI baseline86.4
Community0.0
Published86
Capability · 30%Reported performance across general, reasoning, coding, and agent-oriented evaluations.
HEAD TO HEAD
COMPARE TWO CONTENDERS
Choose any two contenders. We’ll line up what matters.
CONTENDER
MA
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
93
Z
Z.ai
GLM-5.3
92
Maker
Moonshot AI
Z.ai
Parameters
2.8T total; 104B active
743B base; sparse MoE
Context window
1,000,000 tokens
1,000,000 tokens
Modality
Text, image, and video input
Text-focused open-weight release
License
Kimi K3 License
GLM-5.3 License
MA
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
93/100Z
Z.ai
GLM-5.3
92/100
Maker
Moonshot AI
Z.ai
Parameters
2.8T total; 104B active
743B base; sparse MoE
Context window
1,000,000 tokens
1,000,000 tokens
Modality
Text, image, and video input
Text-focused open-weight release
License
Kimi K3 License
GLM-5.3 License
WHY THIS ORDER?
THE RECEIPTS, NOT THE MYSTERY.
Subjective synthesis of supplied 2026 editorial comparisons, prioritizing recurring capability leaders, coding and agent performance, context, modality, and deployment openness.