1Password ranks first among these password managers, and Bitwarden ranks second. All five contenders were evaluated on the same published criteria, and their weighted scores determine the order from highest to lowest.
IMPORTANT CONTEXTFeatures, compatibility, support policies, prices, and availability can change. Check the linked official page before choosing or buying.
01
A
AgileBits
1Password
Best overall
1Password from AgileBits is a software or service option for people comparing password managers. It is the strongest all-around choice in this group, with its clearest strengths in ease and quality. The ease assessment focuses on how approachable and convenient the experience is.
Bitwarden is a software or service option for people comparing password managers. It is the closest alternative to the top choice, with its clearest strengths in ease and compatibility. The ease assessment focuses on how approachable and convenient the experience is. Features is the main point to compare with the nearby contenders before choosing it.
Proton Pass from Proton is a software or service option for people comparing password managers. It offers a balanced middle-ground choice, with its clearest strengths in quality and ease. The quality assessment focuses on overall execution and reliability for the intended use.
Dashlane is a software or service option for people comparing password managers. It is a more specialized alternative, with its clearest strengths in quality and ease. The quality assessment focuses on overall execution and reliability for the intended use. Value is the main point to compare with the nearby contenders before choosing it.
Keeper from Keeper Security is a software or service option for people comparing password managers. It is the most situational option in this top five, with its clearest strengths in quality and ease. The quality assessment focuses on overall execution and reliability for the intended use.
Three independent write-ins unlock an honorable mention. The 10 strongest active mentions are shown; inactive mentions archive after 12 months. At 25 monthly votes, a contender enters a scoring review for possible top-five promotion.
No honorable mentions yet. Repeated write-ins merge automatically.
THE SCORING
HOW ALL FIVE SCORED
The five criteria create the AI baseline. The community adjustment is then added or subtracted to produce the current published score.
Keep the criteria fixedSwipe to compare all five →
Criterion
#11Password
#2Bitwarden
#3Proton Pass
#4Dashlane
#5Keeper
95
90
91
90
87
96
95
91
88
87
93
90
90
87
82
91
95
88
88
86
95
91
89
85
87
AI baseline scoreWeighted criteria result
94.2
91.9
90.0
88.0
85.8
Community adjustmentVote-share influence
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Current published scoreBaseline + community
94
92
90
88
86
#1
1Password
94/100
AI baseline94.2
Community0.0
Published94
#2
Bitwarden
92/100
AI baseline91.9
Community0.0
Published92
#3
Proton Pass
90/100
AI baseline90.0
Community0.0
Published90
#4
Dashlane
88/100
AI baseline88.0
Community0.0
Published88
#5
Keeper
86/100
AI baseline85.8
Community0.0
Published86
Quality · 30%Overall execution and reliability for the intended use.
HEAD TO HEAD
COMPARE THE TOP TWO
Select any two contenders above. We’ll line up what matters.
CONTENDER
A
AgileBits
1Password
94
B
Bitwarden
Bitwarden
92
Brand / maker
AgileBits
Bitwarden
Ranking result
#1 · Highest weighted score
#2 · Second-highest weighted score
Standout quality
Ease
Ease
Also strong in
Quality
Compatibility
Compare closely
Compatibility
Features
A
AgileBits
1Password
94/100
B
Bitwarden
Bitwarden
92/100
Brand / maker
AgileBits
Bitwarden
Ranking result
#1 · Highest weighted score
#2 · Second-highest weighted score
Standout quality
Ease
Ease
Also strong in
Quality
Compatibility
Compare closely
Compatibility
Features
WHY THIS ORDER?
THE RECEIPTS, NOT THE MYSTERY.
SummaRank compared current independent testing, platform support, ownership friction, and official feature documentation, using current material from WIRED, Consumer Reports, PCMag and the linked official or research references. Each contender was scored independently on the same five-part scorecard: Quality 30%, Ease 20%, Features 20%, Compatibility 15%, Value 15%. The weighted total determines the published order from highest to lowest; criterion strengths are not assigned by rank position, and verified community voting can make a limited, visible adjustment.