Fitness & outdoors · Ranking Updated Aug. 12, 2026
Current ranking · 2026

Best running-shoe brands

AIresearched
baseline
+1vote per
month

ASICS ranks first among these running-shoe brands, and Brooks ranks second. All five contenders were evaluated on the same published criteria, and their weighted scores determine the order from highest to lowest.

IMPORTANT CONTEXTFit, conditions, safety needs, specifications, and prices can change. Check the official product or destination guidance for your body, skill level, and intended use.
01
RAS
Road and stability

ASICS

Best overall

ASICS, part of Road and stability, is one of the running-shoe brands considered here. It is the strongest all-around choice in this group, with its clearest strengths in performance and comfort. The performance assessment focuses on capability in the activity it is designed for.
94/100
0 votes
02
DT
Daily training

Brooks

Strongest alternative

Brooks, part of Daily training, is one of the running-shoe brands considered here. It is the closest alternative to the top choice, with its clearest strengths in comfort and value. The comfort assessment focuses on fit and comfort during realistic use. Versatility is the main point to compare with the nearby contenders before choosing it.
92/100
0 votes
03
RAP
Racing and performance

Nike

Best balanced contender

Nike, part of Racing and performance, is one of the running-shoe brands considered here. It offers a balanced middle-ground choice, with its clearest strengths in comfort and performance. The comfort assessment focuses on fit and comfort during realistic use. Value is the main point to compare with the nearby contenders before choosing it.
90/100
0 votes
04
FRA
Fit range and cushioning

New Balance

Best specialist contender

New Balance, part of Fit range and cushioning, is one of the running-shoe brands considered here. It is a more specialized alternative, with its clearest strengths in performance and value. The performance assessment focuses on capability in the activity it is designed for. Comfort is the main point to compare with the nearby contenders before choosing it.
88/100
0 votes
05
MC
Max cushioning

Hoka

Best situational contender

Hoka, part of Max cushioning, is one of the running-shoe brands considered here. It is the most situational option in this top five, with its clearest strengths in durability and value. The durability assessment focuses on ability to withstand regular use and the elements. Comfort is the main point to compare with the nearby contenders before choosing it.
86/100
0 votes
COMMUNITY WRITE-INS

Who did the top five miss?

Three independent write-ins unlock an honorable mention. The 10 strongest active mentions are shown; inactive mentions archive after 12 months. At 25 monthly votes, a contender enters a scoring review for possible top-five promotion.

No honorable mentions yet. Repeated write-ins merge automatically.

Commercial-link disclosure: Some shopping and booking links may become affiliate links when a partner relationship is active. SummaRank may then earn a commission from qualifying purchases or bookings, at no added cost to you. Commercial availability never affects scores or rank order.

HOW ALL FIVE SCORED

The five criteria create the AI baseline. The community adjustment is then added or subtracted to produce the current published score.

Keep the criteria fixedSwipe to compare all five →
Criterion#1ASICS#2Brooks#3Nike#4New Balance#5Hoka
9692919086
9594928381
9191898990
9290888883
9594879089
AI baseline scoreWeighted criteria result94.092.289.888.185.8
Community adjustmentVote-share influence0.00.00.00.00.0
Current published scoreBaseline + community9492908886
#1

ASICS

94/100
AI baseline94.0
Community0.0
Published94
#2

Brooks

92/100
AI baseline92.2
Community0.0
Published92
#3

Nike

90/100
AI baseline89.8
Community0.0
Published90
#4

New Balance

88/100
AI baseline88.1
Community0.0
Published88
#5

Hoka

86/100
AI baseline85.8
Community0.0
Published86
Performance · 30%Capability in the activity it is designed for.

COMPARE THE TOP TWO

Select any two contenders above.
We’ll line up what matters.

CONTENDER
RAS
Road and stability

ASICS

94
DT
Daily training

Brooks

92
Known for
Road and stability
Daily training
Ranking result
#1 · Highest weighted score
#2 · Second-highest weighted score
Standout quality
Performance
Comfort
Also strong in
Comfort
Value
Compare closely
Durability
Versatility
RAS
Road and stability

ASICS

94/100
DT
Daily training

Brooks

92/100

Known for

Road and stability

Daily training

Ranking result

#1 · Highest weighted score

#2 · Second-highest weighted score

Standout quality

Performance

Comfort

Also strong in

Comfort

Value

Compare closely

Durability

Versatility

THE RECEIPTS,
NOT THE MYSTERY.

SummaRank compared field testing, fit and comfort guidance, durability, safety context, and value across realistic use cases, using current material from Outside, REI Co-op, Runner's World and the linked official or research references. Each contender was scored independently on the same five-part scorecard: Performance 30%, Comfort 20%, Durability 20%, Versatility 15%, Value 15%. The weighted total determines the published order from highest to lowest; criterion strengths are not assigned by rank position, and verified community voting can make a limited, visible adjustment.

01Performance
30
02Comfort
20
03Durability
20
04Versatility
15
05Value
15

HOW ALL FIVE SCORED

The five criteria create the AI baseline. The community adjustment is then added or subtracted to produce the current published score.

Keep the criteria fixedSwipe to compare all five →
Criterion#1ASICS#2Brooks#3Nike#4New Balance#5Hoka
9692919086
9594928381
9191898990
9290888883
9594879089
AI baseline scoreWeighted criteria result94.092.289.888.185.8
Community adjustmentVote-share influence0.00.00.00.00.0
Current published scoreBaseline + community9492908886
#1

ASICS

94/100
AI baseline94.0
Community0.0
Published94
#2

Brooks

92/100
AI baseline92.2
Community0.0
Published92
#3

Nike

90/100
AI baseline89.8
Community0.0
Published90
#4

New Balance

88/100
AI baseline88.1
Community0.0
Published88
#5

Hoka

86/100
AI baseline85.8
Community0.0
Published86
Performance · 30%Capability in the activity it is designed for.
Recently viewedFeatured until you browse