Technology · Ranking Updated Aug. 12, 2026
Current ranking · 2026

Best video-conferencing apps

AIresearched
baseline
+1vote per
month

Zoom ranks first among these video-conferencing apps, and Google Meet ranks second. All five contenders were evaluated on the same published criteria, and their weighted scores determine the order from highest to lowest.

IMPORTANT CONTEXTFeatures, compatibility, support policies, prices, and availability can change. Check the linked official page before choosing or buying.
01
ZC
Zoom Communications

Zoom

Best overall

Zoom from Zoom Communications is a software or service option for people comparing video-conferencing apps. It is the strongest all-around choice in this group, with its clearest strengths in quality and compatibility. The quality assessment focuses on overall execution and reliability for the intended use.
94/100
0 votes
02
G
Google

Google Meet

Strongest alternative

Google Meet from Google is a software or service option for people comparing video-conferencing apps. It is the closest alternative to the top choice, with its clearest strengths in features and compatibility. The features assessment focuses on breadth and usefulness of the core feature set.
92/100
0 votes
03
M
Microsoft

Microsoft Teams

Best balanced contender

Microsoft Teams from Microsoft is a software or service option for people comparing video-conferencing apps. It offers a balanced middle-ground choice, with its clearest strengths in compatibility and quality. The compatibility assessment focuses on how well it works with common devices and services.
90/100
0 votes
04
A
Apple

FaceTime

Best specialist contender

FaceTime from Apple is a software or service option for people comparing video-conferencing apps. It is a more specialized alternative, with its clearest strengths in quality and value. The quality assessment focuses on overall execution and reliability for the intended use.
88/100
0 votes
05
C
Cisco

Webex

Best situational contender

Webex from Cisco is a software or service option for people comparing video-conferencing apps. It is the most situational option in this top five, with its clearest strengths in ease and value. The ease assessment focuses on how approachable and convenient the experience is. Features is the main point to compare with the nearby contenders before choosing it.
86/100
0 votes
COMMUNITY WRITE-INS

Who did the top five miss?

Three independent write-ins unlock an honorable mention. The 10 strongest active mentions are shown; inactive mentions archive after 12 months. At 25 monthly votes, a contender enters a scoring review for possible top-five promotion.

No honorable mentions yet. Repeated write-ins merge automatically.

HOW ALL FIVE SCORED

The five criteria create the AI baseline. The community adjustment is then added or subtracted to produce the current published score.

Keep the criteria fixedSwipe to compare all five →
Criterion#1Zoom#2Google Meet#3Microsoft Teams#4FaceTime#5Webex
9688929185
9392868788
9597908584
9696938587
8790898988
AI baseline scoreWeighted criteria result93.892.190.187.886.2
Community adjustmentVote-share influence0.00.00.00.00.0
Current published scoreBaseline + community9492908886
#1

Zoom

94/100
AI baseline93.8
Community0.0
Published94
#2

Google Meet

92/100
AI baseline92.1
Community0.0
Published92
#3

Microsoft Teams

90/100
AI baseline90.1
Community0.0
Published90
#4

FaceTime

88/100
AI baseline87.8
Community0.0
Published88
#5

Webex

86/100
AI baseline86.2
Community0.0
Published86
Quality · 30%Overall execution and reliability for the intended use.

COMPARE THE TOP TWO

Select any two contenders above.
We’ll line up what matters.

CONTENDER
ZC
Zoom Communications

Zoom

94
G
Google

Google Meet

92
Provider
Zoom Communications
Google
Ranking result
#1 · Highest weighted score
#2 · Second-highest weighted score
Standout quality
Quality
Features
Also strong in
Compatibility
Compatibility
Compare closely
Value
Quality
ZC
Zoom Communications

Zoom

94/100
G
Google

Google Meet

92/100

Provider

Zoom Communications

Google

Ranking result

#1 · Highest weighted score

#2 · Second-highest weighted score

Standout quality

Quality

Features

Also strong in

Compatibility

Compatibility

Compare closely

Value

Quality

THE RECEIPTS,
NOT THE MYSTERY.

SummaRank compared current independent testing, platform support, ownership friction, and official feature documentation, using current material from WIRED, Consumer Reports, PCMag and the linked official or research references. Each contender was scored independently on the same five-part scorecard: Quality 30%, Ease 20%, Features 20%, Compatibility 15%, Value 15%. The weighted total determines the published order from highest to lowest; criterion strengths are not assigned by rank position, and verified community voting can make a limited, visible adjustment.

01Quality
30
02Ease
20
03Features
20
04Compatibility
15
05Value
15

HOW ALL FIVE SCORED

The five criteria create the AI baseline. The community adjustment is then added or subtracted to produce the current published score.

Keep the criteria fixedSwipe to compare all five →
Criterion#1Zoom#2Google Meet#3Microsoft Teams#4FaceTime#5Webex
9688929185
9392868788
9597908584
9696938587
8790898988
AI baseline scoreWeighted criteria result93.892.190.187.886.2
Community adjustmentVote-share influence0.00.00.00.00.0
Current published scoreBaseline + community9492908886
#1

Zoom

94/100
AI baseline93.8
Community0.0
Published94
#2

Google Meet

92/100
AI baseline92.1
Community0.0
Published92
#3

Microsoft Teams

90/100
AI baseline90.1
Community0.0
Published90
#4

FaceTime

88/100
AI baseline87.8
Community0.0
Published88
#5

Webex

86/100
AI baseline86.2
Community0.0
Published86
Quality · 30%Overall execution and reliability for the intended use.
Recently viewedFeatured until you browse